Acidic oceans
Biomass overdose
.. dioxide
... & its cycle
.. monoxide
... & its cycle
CO2 ailments
CO2 dispersion
Damned nonsense
Estimating CO2
Footprint fraud
Forks biomass
Honey bees
Hood Canal
Warming lie

Reach us

We educate, we elucidate, we liberate, we grate, we berate, we cybrate!

"But what, you ask, of earth? Earth, I think, will not be found by anyone to be in the end a very distinct place. I think earth, if chosen instead of Heaven, will turn out to have been, all along, only a region in Hell; and earth, if put second to Heaven, to have been from the beginning a part of Heaven itself." C. S. Lewis, The Great Divorce, Touchstone, 1996, Page 11. Also, HarperSanFrancisco (HarperCollins), 2001, Page ix. (It is in the Preface).


Think of carbon dioxide, CO2 as a coin. If Side One is the 'global' or atmospheric level, then there must be another side, Side Two, that is the local level. I worked my way into the study of CO2 via Side Two. I hadn't heard of Side One when I began. (Yes, it has been a while)!

I quickly discovered many areas where local CO2 was a significant problem, but for some reason, it was ignored. Where it couldn't be ignored, there were attempts to downplay its importance.

While pondering what it was that was really transpiring, I encountered the 'global warming' stuff. It made me suspicious that so much time, effort, and material was spent on Side One of the CO2 coin, while everyone seemed to pretend there was no Side Two. (They are still pretending)!

My conclusion was and is that 'global warming' was invented to obsure the Law of Gravity and hide the damage CO2 is capable of doing and has done, and protect those responsible. This function or purpose is, I believe, the greatest argument against 'global warming.' It is a fraud, but because of this purpose, it is a very dangerous fraud.

Carbon dioxide gas pours almost like a liquid, tends to seek the lowest places, displaces air (including oxygen), and does not readily disperse. (Its atomic weight is 44, almost one and one half times the weight of air).

Recall that man-made CO2, the stuff that gets the attention, comes from or is made mostly in concentrated areas. Why should we look up at the atmosphere when emission change (requiring more CO2 be produced --- incidentally, this takes more oxygen out of the air) and more airtight buildings (requiring we endure more CO2) demand we look locally? Why are those who forced emission change and more airtight buildings the very same ones who are most rabidly in favor of 'global warming?'

Side Two of the coin (the local level) is fraught with deceit. It is counterfeit. Doesn't that make the whole coin fake? Nevertheless, let them have it their way. Let's tackle Side One, 'global warming,' head on and destroy it first. Its defects speak for themselves. Please allow me to demonstrate but, first, consider this:

"While the earth remaineth, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease." Genesis 8:22

Now why should you listen to me if you won't believe God? Perhaps the proper question is, "Why should you listen to and believe the proponents of 'global warming?'" You are deceived if you do. (To 'Global Warming' Lie page).

Copyright © 2007, 2008, 2009 Donald L. Beeman. All rights reserved.